Hegel of the gaps? Truth, falsity and conjunction in Hegelian contradictions

Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-13 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I offer here a critical assessment of Beall and Ficara’s most recent take on Hegelian contradictions. By interpreting differently some key passages of Hegel’s work, I favor, unlike them, a no-gaps approach which leads to a different logic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-26

Downloads
50 (#457,975)

6 months
13 (#197,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luis Estrada-González
National Autonomous University of Mexico

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Logical Nihilism: Could There Be No Logic?Gillian Russell - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):308-324.
Conjunctive paraconsistency.Franca D’Agostini - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6845-6874.
Hegelian Conjunction, Hegelian Contradiction.Jc Beall & Elena Ficara - 2023 - History and Philosophy of Logic 44 (2):119-131.
Nothing but the Truth.Andreas Pietz & Umberto Rivieccio - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):125-135.
Q-consequence operation.Grzegorz Malinowski - 1990 - Reports on Mathematical Logic 24 (1):49--59.

View all 19 references / Add more references