What Makes a Home: A Reply

Law and Philosophy 41 (4):469-489 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply to “What Makes a Home” by Kimberley Brownlee and David Jenkins. In it, I defend my own account of homelessness, which I call the ‘legal conception’ against their criticism and try to illustrate the differences between my view and theirs, which I call the ‘social conception.’

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,978

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ontology and Analogy.P. Æ Hutchings - 1969 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 18:184-188.
Ethical Home.Elizabeth Lanphier - 2020 - Social Philosophy Today 36:105-124.
Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441 - 447.
Social mechanisms and explaining how : A reply to Kimberly Chuang.Johannes Persson - 2012 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (9):37-41.
What Liberalism Means.Ronald Beiner - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1):190.
Basic beliefs and the regress of justification: A reply to Yalcin.Steven Rappaport - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (4):527-533.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-18

Downloads
36 (#623,830)

6 months
15 (#200,807)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Homelessness and freedom.Katy Wells - 2024 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 27 (7):1111-1130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What a Home Does.David Jenkins & Kimberley Brownlee - 2022 - Law and Philosophy 41 (4):441-468.

Add more references