Talisse’s Overdoing Democracy and the Inevitability of Conflict

Journal of Philosophical Research 46:155-171 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Overdoing Democracy is an important contribution to the literature on (deliberative) democracy, as it offers a sobering diagnosis of the risks and pitfalls of (overdoing) democracy in the form of internal critique. But the book does not go far enough in its diagnosis because it is not sufficiently critical towards some of the basic assumptions of deliberative conceptions of democracy. In particular, Talisse does not sufficiently attend to the inevitable power struggles in a society, where different groups and individuals must protect their own (often conflicting) interests instead of working towards a ‘common good.’ In this essay, I contrast two different visions of democracy and politics, one based on ideals of consensus and cooperation, and another on the inevitability of perennial conflict. I then briefly present an alternative to deliberative conceptions of democracy that has gained traction in recent decades, known as agonism. Next, I offer a short reconstruction of Talisse’s proposal, and finally I sketch a critical assessment of some of his main claims and assumptions from an agonistic perspective.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why We Should Stop Fethishing Democracy.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Research 46:145-154.
A critique of pragmatism and deliberative democracy.Thom Brooks - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Synopsis of Overdoing Democracy.Robert B. Talisse - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Research 46:141-143.
Agonism in divided societies.Andrew Schaap - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):255-277.
Critical republicanism: Jürgen Habermas and Chantal Mouffe.Gulshan Khan - 2013 - Contemporary Political Theory 12 (4):318-337.
Conflict, consensus, and liberty in J. S. Mill’s representative democracy.Gustavo Hessmann Dalaqua - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):110-130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-16

Downloads
27 (#822,464)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catarina Dutilh Novaes
VU University Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Depolarization Without Reconciliation.Robert B. Talisse - 2023 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 35 (4):426-449.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references