Moral Relativism and Moral Nihilism

In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford handbook of ethical theory. New York: Oxford University Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The chapter discusses moral nihilism and moral relativism, with some sympathy, especially to relativism. It considers some arguments for the views, some arguments against them, and some arguments designed to decide between them. Moral nihilism and moral relativism are meta-ethical theories, theories of the nature of morality. Nihilism is the view that there are no moral facts, that nothing is right or wrong, or morally good or bad. Relativism is the view that moral statements are true or false only relative to some standard or other, that things are right or wrong relative to Catholic morality, say, and different things are right or wrong relative to Confucian morality, but nothing is right or wrong simpliciter.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
22 (#971,181)

6 months
20 (#145,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Dreier
Brown University

Citations of this work

The error in the error theory.Stephen Finlay - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):347-369.
Metaethical Internalism: Another Neglected Distinction.Jon Tresan - 2009 - The Journal of Ethics 13 (1):51-72.
Noncognitivism and Epistemic Evaluations.Bob Beddor - 2019 - Philosophers' Imprint 19.
Evolutionary Ethics.Michael Klenk - 2019 - Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references