- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reply to 'the scope and limit of mental simulation'
In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The scope and limit of mental simulation.Pierre Jacob - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Reply to Simulation Theory and Mental Concepts.William Child - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Mental simulation, dialogical processing and the syndrome of autism.Donald M. Peterson - 2002 - In Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Varieties of Simulation.François Recanati - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins. pp. 151-171.
Simulation theory and mental concepts.A. Goldman - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Expertise and the Mental Simulation of Action.Sian L. Beilock & Ian M. Lyons - 2009 - In Keith Douglas Markman, William Martin Klein & Julie A. Suhr (eds.), Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation. New York City, New York, USA: Psychology Press.
Reply to 'from simulation to theory'.S. Gianfranco - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Reply to Alvin I. Goldman.William Child - 2002 - In Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 45--21.
Reply to Can 'Radical' Simulation Theories Explain Psychological Concept Acquisition?.Pascal Ludwig - 2002 - In Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.), Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2009-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
In Defense of Phenomenological Approaches to Social Cognition: Interacting with the Critics.Shaun Gallagher - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (2):187-212.
Enactive and Behavioral Abstraction Accounts of Social Understanding in Chimpanzees, Infants, and Adults.Shaun Gallagher & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (1):145-169.
On the nature, uses and functions of imagination in education: A multidisciplinary approach.Alessandro Gelmi - 2024 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 56 (12):1210-1228.
Une défense hétérodoxe de la conception inférentialiste de l'introspection.Pascal Ludwig - 2005 - Dialogue 44 (1):123-144.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-d9z9s uwo