How Do Young People with Cystic Fibrosis Conceptualize the Distinction Between Research and Treatment? A Qualitative Interview Study

, , , &
AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (4):1-11 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/23294515.2014.997898

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Governing Gene Drive Technologies: A Qualitative Interview Study.N. de Graeff, Karin R. Jongsma, Jeantine E. Lunshof & Annelien L. Bredenoord - 2022 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (2):107-124.
Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.Rachel S. Purvis, Traci H. Abraham, Christopher R. Long, M. Kathryn Stewart, T. Scott Warmack & Pearl Anna McElfish - 2017 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 8 (2):69-74.
Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.Angela Ballantyne & Andrew Moore - 2018 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):143-153.
Primary care physicians' views about gatekeeping in clinical research recruitment: A qualitative study.Marilys Guillemin, Rosalind McDougall, Dominique Martin, Nina Hallowell, Alison Brookes & Lynn Gillam - 2017 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 8 (2):99-105.
Improving dissemination of study results: perspectives of individuals with cystic fibrosis.Emily Christofides, Karla Stroud, Diana Elizabeth Tullis & Kieran C. O’Doherty - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-14.
Restrictions on Reproductive Care at Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Perspectives.Jocelyn M. Wascher, Debra B. Stulberg & Lori R. Freedman - 2020 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (4):257-267.
How Do Street-Level Research Workers Think About the Ethics of Doing Research “On the Ground” With Marginalized Target Populations?Kenneth A. Richman, Leslie B. Alexander & Gala True - 2015 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 6 (2):1-11.
Bioethics as Object of Study: Dilemmas of Immanence in Research Ethics Review.Carey DeMichelis - 2021 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 12 (2):137-143.
Évaluer les obstacles et les facilitateurs à la participation sociale en contextes scolaires et professionnels de jeunes atteints de mucoviscidose.Sylvain Silvestri Ferez - 2023 - Alter - European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche Sur le Handicap 17-2 (17-2):5-25.
A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.M. Smirnoff, I. Wilets, D. F. Ragin, R. Adams, J. Holohan, R. Rhodes, G. Winkel, E. M. Ricci, C. Clesca & L. D. Richardson - 2018 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (1):39-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-03

Downloads
60 (#356,019)

6 months
5 (#1,042,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethics in human subjects research: Do incentives matter?Ruth W. Grant & Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):717 – 738.

View all 8 references / Add more references