Chinese History and the Question of Orientalism

History and Theory 35 (4):95-117 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The discussion develops Edward Said's thesis of orientialism. Said approached "orientalism" as a construction of Asia by Europeans, and a problem in Euro-American modernity. This essay argues that, from the beginning, Asians participated in the construction of the orient, and that orientalism therefore should be viewed as a problem in Asian modernities as well. The essay utilizes Mary Louise Pratt's idea of "contact zones" to argue that orientalism was a product of the circulation of Euro-American and Asian intellectuals in these contact zones, or borderlands. While orientalism has been very much implicated in power relations between Euro-America and Asia, the question of power nevertheless should be separated analytically from the construction of orientalism. In support of this argument, the essay points to the contemporary "self-orientalization" of Asian intellectuals, which is a manifestation not of powerlessness but newly-acquired power

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maritime Orientalism, Or The Political Theory Of Water.Jonathan Scott - 2014 - History of Political Thought 35 (1):70-90.
Orientalism. [REVIEW]Raymond Aaron Younis - 1997 - Asian Studies Review 21 (1):168-170.
Orientalism as a Sign of Provincialism.Elisa Karezyńska - 2012 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 100 (1):177-195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-26

Downloads
185 (#131,223)

6 months
16 (#187,025)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references