Response to Emmanuel Salanskis's review of Paolo D'Iorio, Le voyage de Nietzsche à Sorrente , JNS 44:1 [Book Review]

Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (3):510-512 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his review of my book, Le voyage de Nietzsche à Sorrente, Emmanuel Salanskis writes that it is an agreeable read and philologically precise, but that it presents some philosophical difficulties.The first alleged difficulty lies in the conception of “epiphany.” Salanskis asks, “Can we really include Nietzsche among adherents of an aesthetics of the ‘instant’ (170) like Virginia Woolf ?” No, certainly not. On the page cited, I discuss James Joyce’s conception of epiphany (and mention Virginia Woolf only in passing) in order to distinguish Joycean epiphanies and the aesthetics of the instant from Nietzsche’s epiphanies. The latter, I argue shortly thereafter, are “from an epistemological point of view not moments ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Promise of Happiness? Nietzsche on Beauty.Annamaria Lossi - 2022 - Nietzsche Studien 51 (1):179-194.
Nietzsche on value creation.Aaron Harper - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Introducing Epiphanies.Sophie Grace Chappell - 2019 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 2 (1):95-121.
Nietzsche, the self, and Schopenhauer.Christopher Janaway - 1991 - In Keith Ansell-Pearson (ed.), Nietzsche and Modern German Thought. New York: Routledge. pp. 119–142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-12

Downloads
77 (#272,018)

6 months
5 (#1,038,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references