- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Testing times for the consumer genetics revolution
The New Scientist 221 (2251):26-27 (2014)
Abstract
With the highest profile seller of $99 genetic tests under fire, will public trust in personalised medicine suffer?Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The omics of our lives: practices and policies of direct-to-consumer epigenetic and microbiomic testing companies.Terese Knoppers, Elisabeth Beauchamp, Ken Dewar, Sarah Kimmins, Guillaume Bourque, Yann Joly & Charles Dupras - 2021 - New Genetics and Society 40 (4):541-569.
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: How the Promise of a Personalised Approach is Being Squandered.H. Belt - unknown
Consuming genetics as a life insurance consumer.Anya E. R. Prince - 2021 - In I. Glenn Cohen, Nita A. Farahany, Henry T. Greely & Carmel Shachar (eds.), Consumer genetic technologies: ethical and legal considerations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Consumer genetic technologies: ethical and legal considerations.I. Glenn Cohen, Nita A. Farahany, Henry T. Greely & Carmel Shachar (eds.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Re-examining the Gene in Personalized Genomics.Jordan Bartol - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (10):2529-2546.
Shifting metaphors in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: from genes as information to genes as big data.Paula Saukko - 2017 - New Genetics and Society 36 (3):296-313.
Reading the fine print when buying your genetic self online: direct-to-consumer genetic testing terms and conditions.Andelka M. Phillips - 2017 - New Genetics and Society 36 (3):273-295.
The New Genetics and Informed Consent: Differentiating Choice to Preserve Autonomy.Eline M. Bunnik, Antina de Jong, Niels Nijsingh & Guido M. W. R. de Wert - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (6):348-355.
The New Genetics and Informed Consent: Differentiating Choice to Preserve Autonomy.Eline M. Bunnik, Antina Jong, Niels Nijsingh & Guido M. W. R. Wert - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (6):348-355.
Attitudes and experiences of European clinical geneticists towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a qualitative interview study.Louiza Kalokairinou, Pascal Borry & Heidi C. Howard - 2019 - New Genetics and Society 38 (4):410-429.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-06-14
Downloads
445 (#65,250)
6 months
93 (#65,972)
2019-06-14
Downloads
445 (#65,250)
6 months
93 (#65,972)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-72rpk uwo