In Defence of Particularism: A Reply to Stokes

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (11):27-33 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A reply to Patrick Stokes' “Between Generalism and Particularism About Conspiracy Theory".

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conspiracy Theory Particularism, Both Moral and Epistemic, Versus Generalism.Dr Dr Lee Basham - 2018 - In Matthew R. X. Dentith (ed.), Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 39-58.
Particularism as the Corrective to the Conventional Wisdom Regarding Conspiracy Theories.Kurtis Hagen - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (12):30-33.
Where Are the Generalists?Scott Hill - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (11):30-35.
Why We Should Stop Talking about Generalism and Particularism: Moving the Debate on Conspiracy Theories Forward.Maarten Boudry & M. Giulia Napolitano - 2023 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9):22-26.
Conspiracy Theories and Their Investigator(s).R. X. Dentith Matthew - 2017 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (4):4-11.
Reconciling Conceptual Confusions in the Le Monde Debate on Conspiracy Theories, J.C.M. Duetz and M R. X. Dentith.Julia Duetz & M. R. X. Dentith - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11):40-50.
What particularism about conspiracy theories entails.M. R. X. Dentith - 2018 - In Matthew R. X. Dentith (ed.), Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 59-69.
Conspiracy Theories, Deplorables, and Defectibility: A Reply to Patrick Stokes.Charles R. Pigden - 2018 - In Matthew R. X. Dentith (ed.), Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 203-215.
The Role of Stereotypes in Theorizing About Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Dentith.Scott Hill - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8):93-99.
Treating Conspiracy Theories Seriously: A Reply to Basham on Dentith.Matthew R. X. Dentith - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (9):1-5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-25

Downloads
675 (#38,570)

6 months
84 (#74,168)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M R. X. Dentith
Beijing Normal University

Citations of this work

Suspicious conspiracy theories.M. R. X. Dentith - 2022 - Synthese 200 (3):1-14.
Genealogical Undermining for Conspiracy Theories.Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-23.
Political Genealogies for Conspiracy Theories, Debunked.Alexios Stamatiadis-Bréhier - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (1):27-40.
Conspiracy Theories and Their Investigator(s).R. X. Dentith Matthew - 2017 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (4):4-11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories?Charles Pigden - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):3-34.

Add more references