Conspiracy Theories and Their Investigator(s)

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (4):4-11 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A reply to Patrick Stokes' 'Reluctance and Suspicion'—itself a reply to an early piece by myself replying to Stokes—in which I clarify what it is I intend when talking about how we should investigate conspiracy theories.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In Defence of Particularism: A Reply to Stokes.Matthew R. X. Dentith - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (11):27-33.
The Role of Stereotypes in Theorizing About Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Dentith.Scott Hill - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8):93-99.
Substantive Disagreement in the Le Monde Debate and Beyond: Replies to Duetz and Dentith, Basham, and Hewitt.Scott Hill - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (11):18-25.
Treating Conspiracy Theories Seriously: A Reply to Basham on Dentith.Matthew R. X. Dentith - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (9):1-5.
The Philosophy of Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. [REVIEW]Ori Freiman - 2019 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (9):51-61.
Why We Should Stop Talking about Generalism and Particularism: Moving the Debate on Conspiracy Theories Forward.Maarten Boudry & M. Giulia Napolitano - 2023 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9):22-26.
Reconciling Conceptual Confusions in the Le Monde Debate on Conspiracy Theories, J.C.M. Duetz and M R. X. Dentith.Julia Duetz & M. R. X. Dentith - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (11):40-50.
Is ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Harmful? A Reply to Foster and Ichikawa.Scott Hill - 2023 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 12 (9):27-31.
Conspiracy Theories, Deplorables, and Defectibility: A Reply to Patrick Stokes.Charles R. Pigden - 2018 - In Matthew R. X. Dentith, Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 203-215.
Rethinking Conspiracy Theories: Method First! A Reply to Shields.Sanja Dembić - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (10):38-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-19

Downloads
668 (#42,529)

6 months
62 (#95,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M R. X. Dentith
Beijing Normal University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

In Defence of Particularism: A Reply to Stokes.Matthew R. X. Dentith - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (11):27-33.

Add more references