Catholic Social Thought and the Capability Approach

Journal of Catholic Social Thought 19 (2):205-229 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite a growing body of literature that engages both Catholic social thought and the Capability Approach, little has been done to explore what these two traditions of thought might offer to a reassessment of the project of global democracy promotion. This essay brings Catholic social thought and the Capability Approach into conversation for this purpose. What emerges is a framework for thinking about and engaging in what the author calls democratic democracy promotion (DDP). DDP is based on a broadened conception of democracy and avoids a dogmatic commitment to the promotion of Western liberal democracy; it takes a needs-based approach to the allocation of externally driven democracy assistance; and it prioritizes education initiatives as central components of democracy promotion. Refashioned as such, democracy promotion has the potential to bring about more participatory democratic processes, a more inclusive global democracy, and a critical and caring mass of global democrats.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Case for Global Democracy? Arms Exports and Conflicting Goals in Democracy Promotion.Pavel Dufek & Michal Mochťak - 2019 - Journal of International Relations and Development 22 (3):610–639.
Catholic Social thought and modern Liberal Democracy.Thomas W. Smith - 2008 - Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 11 (1):15-48.
John Courtney Murray, the Liberal Tradition, and American Democracy.William Gould - 2007 - Journal of Catholic Social Thought 4 (1):131-162.
Democracy and Dewey’s Notion of Religious Experience.Erin McKenna - 2013 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):301-310.
Democracy and the neo‐liberal promotion of arbitrary power.Barry Hindess - 2000 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):68-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-08

Downloads
17 (#1,149,837)

6 months
5 (#1,038,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references