No-go theorems: What are they good for?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 86 (C):47-55 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,065

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What are narratives good for?John Beatty - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:33-40.
Interpreting cosmic no hair theorems: Is fatalism about the far future of expanding cosmological models unavoidable?Juliusz Doboszewski - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 66:170-179.
The Frauchiger-Renner argument: A new no-go result?Sebastian Fortin & Olimpia Lombardi - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 70:1-7.
Culture in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin.Leon F. Goldstein - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (4):442-443.
Why the “stimulus-error” did not go away.M. Chirimuuta - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:33-42.
Radin, Paul, Social Anthropology. [REVIEW]Reich Reich - 1933 - Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 2:435.
Radin, Max, Law as Logic and Experience. [REVIEW]Neumann Neumann - 1941 - Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 9:157.
Duhem on Good Sense and Theory Pursuit: From Virtue to Social Epistemology.Jamie Shaw - 2020 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33 (2):67-85.
Severe weather event attribution: Why values won't go away.Eric Winsberg, Naomi Oreskes & Elisabeth Lloyd - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84:142-149.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-03

Downloads
47 (#520,319)

6 months
7 (#622,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Radin Dardashti
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations