Severe weather event attribution: Why values won't go away

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84:142-149 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naomi Oreskes, Why trust science?, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Davis Kuykendall - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (3):1-4.
Why the “stimulus-error” did not go away.M. Chirimuuta - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:33-42.
Weather, when and why?Daryn Lehoux - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (4):835-843.
Why the ‘A’ Word Won’t Go Away.Tom Flynn - 2008 - Free Inquiry 28:15-16.
Eric Winsberg. Philosophy and Climate Science.Vincent Lam - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (2):376-379.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-26

Downloads
86 (#251,873)

6 months
12 (#218,371)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eric Winsberg
University of South Florida
Elisabeth Lloyd
Indiana University, Bloomington
Naomi Oreskes
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Philosophy’s other climate problem☆.Michael Brownstein & Neil Levy - 2021 - Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (4):536-553.
A Rawlsian Solution to the New Demarcation Problem.Frank Cabrera - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (8):810-827.
Using Paleoclimate Analogues to Inform Climate Projections.Aja Watkins - 2024 - Perspectives on Science 32 (4):415-459.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references