Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):207-208 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00011316

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,004

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Social Intervention.Harold Orlans, Edward Diener, Rick Crandall, Gordon Bermant, Herbert C. Kelman & Donald P. Warwick - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (3):42.
Some reactions to manuscript review from a questionnaire study.Charles N. Cofer - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):745-746.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: “It's like déjà vu all over again!”.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):401-403.
Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?Andrew M. Colman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):205-206.
Authorship and manuscript reviewing: The risk of bias.Lois DeBakey - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):208-209.
Domenic V. Cicchetti (1991) the reliability of Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Bbs 14: 119-186. Author's response. [REVIEW]C. Crothers, Rd Luce, Jd Sinclair & Dv Cicchetti - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):398-403.
Valedictory editorial.Stevan Harnad - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):1-1.
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.Charles A. Kiesler - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):151-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
26 (#941,221)

6 months
2 (#1,375,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

When journal editors play favorites.Remco Heesen - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (4):831-858.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 24 references / Add more references