Manuscript evaluation by journal referees and editors: Randomness or bias?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):205-206 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00011298

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Authorship and manuscript reviewing: The risk of bias.Lois DeBakey - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):208-209.
In praise of randomness.Peter H. Schönemann - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):162-163.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.
The adaptive fitness of randomness in choice and foraging behavior.Pierre Bovet - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):331-332.
The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.
Where lies the bias?John Palmer & K. Ramakrishna Rao - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):618.
Threat bias, not negativity bias, underpins differences in political ideology.Scott O. Lilienfeld & Robert D. Latzman - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):318-319.
Editorial responsibilities in manuscript review.Rick Crandall - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):207-208.
Achievement test bias.Donald Ross Green - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):344-344.
Error and bias in the selection of data.Robert Rosenthal - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):352-353.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
50 (#487,750)

6 months
10 (#387,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Peer Review May Not Be Such a Bad Idea: Response to Heesen and Bright.Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (4):927-940.
Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.
Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.

View all 37 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 24 references / Add more references