What makes a response to schoolroom wrongs permissible?

Theory and Research in Education 18 (1):23-39 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Howard’s moral fortification theory of criminal punishment lends itself to justifying correction for children in schools that is supportive. There are good reasons to include other students in the learning opportunity occasioned by doing right in response to wrong, which need not exploit the wrongdoing student as a mere means. Care ethics can facilitate restorative and problem-solving approaches to correction. However, there are overriding reasons against doing so when this stigmatises the wrongdoing student, since this inhibits their learning. Responses that avoidably stigmatise students impermissibly undermine both the developmental ethos of education, and students’ recognition and respect for each other as equals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-09

Downloads
231 (#111,179)

6 months
63 (#89,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Brown Coverdale
University College London

Citations of this work

Educational justice.Julian Culp - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (12):e12713.
An error of punishment defences in the context of schooling.DaN McKee - 2024 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (6):1127-1146.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references