On Russell's principle of induction

Synthese 86 (2):285-295 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An improvement on Horwich's so-called pseudo-proof of Russell 's principle of induction is offered, which, we believe, avoids certain objections to the former. Although strictly independent of our other work in this area, a connection can be made and in the final section we comment on this and certain questions regarding rationality, etc

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Not To Know The Principle of Induction.Howard Sankey - 2021 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11 (3):243-254.
Justification of Induction: Russell and Jin Yuelin. A Comparative Study.Chen Bo - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):353-378.
An induction principle over real numbers.Assia Mahboubi - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (1-2):43-49.
On Induction Principles for Partial Orders.Ievgen Ivanov - 2022 - Logica Universalis 16 (1):105-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
101 (#207,225)

6 months
12 (#277,123)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1982 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1982 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 47 (4):687-688.
Probability and Evidence.Paul Horwich - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (4):547.

View all 11 references / Add more references