Transfer of illusion decrement as a function of perceived similarity

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (5):881 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0036326

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Perceived length depends on exposure duration: Straight lines and Muller-Lyer stimuli.Albert Erlebacher & Robert Sekuler - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):724.
Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Müller-Lyer illusion.Paul T. Mountjoy - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):97.
Orientation specificity in the transfer of illusion decrement training.C. Porac & S. Coren - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):336-336.
Comparison of the wings-in, wings-out, and Brentano variants of the Mueller-Lyer illusion.Clare Porac - 1994 - American Journal of Psychology 107:69-83.
The destruction of the Müller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: I. An examination of two theories.Wolfgang Köhler & Julia Fishback - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (2):267.
Illusion decrement in wings-in and wings-out Müller-Lyer figures.Maria Watson, Suzanne Greist-Bousquet & H. R. Schiffman - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (2):139-142.
The re-pairing decrement in verbal discrimination transfer: Further evidence favoring associative mechanisms.N. Jack Kanak & John M. Knight - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (2):304.
Transfer as a function of stimulus, response, and simultaneous stimulus and response similarity.Barbara S. Uehling & Benton J. Underwood - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):375.
Two experiments are reported in which the decline or decrement in the magnitude of the Brentano Müller-Lyer illusion was measured. Observers made a pre-test judgment and, after a variable intervening time period, a post-test judgment of illusion magnitude. In experiment 1, the intervening time periods were 1, 2, and 3 min during which time the independent groups of observers allocated to each of the three time periods either systematically scanned the Brentano figure (inspection conditions) or waited until the intervening period had elapsed (no-inspection conditions). Experiment 2, which included an additional 5 min intervening time period, evaluated a response-bias explanation for the results of the inspection conditions of experiment 1. Taken together, the findings of the two experiments indicate that sheer inspection of the Brentano figure produces illusion decrement. However, illusion decrement was independent of the duration of the inspection period, with equivalent amounts of dec. [REVIEW]J. Predebon - 1998 - Perception 27:183-192.
Susceptibility to optical illusions: specific or general?M. A. Tinker - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (6):593.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
16 (#1,178,879)

6 months
6 (#827,406)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references