Who’s Afraid of Inconsistent Mathematics?

ProtoSociology 25:24-35 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary mathematical theories are generally thought to be consistent. But it hasn’t always been this way; there have been times in the history of mathematics when the consistency of various mathematical theories has been called into question. And some theories, such as naïve set theory and (arguably) the early calculus, were shown to be inconsistent. In this paper I will consider some of the philosophical issues arising from inconsistent mathematical theories.

Other Versions

reprint Colyvan, Mark (2008) "Who’s Afraid of Inconsistent Mathematics?". In Preyer, Gerhard, Philosophy of Mathematics: Set Theory, Measuring Theories, and Nominalism, pp. 28-39: Ontos (2008)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
42 (#532,324)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Colyvan
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Why logical pluralism?Colin R. Caret - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 20):4947-4968.
Representing the World with Inconsistent Mathematics.Colin McCullough-Benner - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1331-1358.
The ontological commitments of inconsistent theories.Mark Colyvan - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (1):115 - 123.
Is science inconsistent?Otávio Bueno & Peter Vickers - 2014 - Synthese 191 (13):2887-2889.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references