- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory
New York: Oxford University Press UK (2000)
Abstract
Jules Coleman, one of the world's most influential philosophers of law, here expounds his recent views on a range of important issues in legal theory. Coleman offers for the first time an explicit account of the pragmatist method that has long informed his work, and takes on the views of highly respected contemporaries such as Ronald Dworkin and Joseph Raz.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
In Pursuit of Pragmatic Legal Theory.Wil Waluchow - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15 (1):125-150.
Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to `the Concept of Law'.Jules L. Coleman (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Analyzing law: new essays in legal theory.Brian Bix (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Two Views of the Nature of the Theory of Law: A Partial Comparison: Joseph Raz.Joseph Raz - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (3):249-282.
The practice of principle, Jules L. Coleman. Oxford university press, 2001, XX+226 pages. [REVIEW]Steven Hetcher - 2003 - Economics and Philosophy 19 (2):345-353.
In the realm of legal and moral philosophy: critical encounters.Matthew H. Kramer - 1999 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Law and social justice.Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.) - 2005 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jeffrie G. Murphy and Jules L. Coleman, Philosophy of Law. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10:189-192.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-10-14
Downloads
15 (#1,233,030)
6 months
6 (#858,075)
2015-10-14
Downloads
15 (#1,233,030)
6 months
6 (#858,075)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Attitude and Social Rules, or Why It's Okay to Slurp Your Soup.Jeffrey Kaplan - 2021 - Philosophers' Imprint 21 (28).
Law is not (best considered) an essentially contested concept.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - International Journal of Law in Context 7:209-232.
Assessing contemporary legislative proposals for their compatibility with a natural law case for AI legal personhood.Joshua Jowitt - forthcoming - AI and Society.
Human Rights and the Forgotten Acts of Meaning in the Social Conventions of Conceptual Jurisprudence.William Conklin - 2014 - Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 2 (1):169-199.
Why was Alchourrón afraid of snakes?Juliano S. A. Maranhão - 2006 - Análisis Filosófico 26 (1):62-92.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo