- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the Deontic Validity of the General Exclusive Norm
Phenomenology and Mind 24:248-256 (2023)
Abstract
The paper concerns the following two questions: (i) is the general exclusive norm a proper legal norm? (ii) if the general exclusive norm is a proper legal norm, is it universally valid? It will be held that the general exclusive norm is a proper legal norm and not a logical principle. Therefore, as a legal norm, it can be said to be valid or invalid. The answer to the second question will be negative: the general exclusive norm, as a proper legal norm, is valid only in those legal systems in which it is positively established.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Problems of the Stufenbaulehre: Kelsen’s Failure to Derive the Validity of a Norm from Another Norm.András Jakab - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (1):35-68.
Linguistic Form of the Legal Norm.Camelia Ignatescu - 2013 - Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 5 (2):67-74.
Probleme der Stufenbaulehre.András Jakab - 2005 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 91 (3):333-365.
Legal System and Practical Reason. On the Structure of a Normative Theory of Law.Jan-Reinard Sieckmann - 1992 - Ratio Juris 5 (3):288-307.
Aquinas’s lex iniusta non est lex: a Test of Legal Validity.Andre Santos Campos - 2014 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 100 (3):366-378.
Why Kelsen’s Basic Norm Does not Include a Transition from Is to Ought.Matheus Pelegrino Da Silva - 2023 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 109 (2):231-245.
Epistemological–Normative Function of the Basic Norm in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law.Wojciech Włoch - 2013 - Dialogue and Universalism 23 (2):25-42.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-11-22
Downloads
14 (#1,274,571)
6 months
7 (#702,633)
2023-11-22
Downloads
14 (#1,274,571)
6 months
7 (#702,633)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-45kst uwo