When Experts Disagree

Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3 (1):68-79 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

original Coady, David (2006) "When experts disagree". Episteme 3(1-2):68-79

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
45 (#490,914)

6 months
5 (#1,035,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Coady
University of Tasmania

Citations of this work

Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Thi Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.
On What it Takes to be an Expert.Michel Croce - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):1-21.
The Epistemic Value of Expert Autonomy.Finnur Dellsén - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2):344-361.
Taking responsibility for health in an epistemically polluted environment.Neil Levy - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (2):123-141.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references