- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):23 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Choice Under Risk: How Occupation Influences Preferences.Tetiana Hill, Petko Kusev & Paul van Schaik - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10:428505.
Differential effects of knowledge of results and monetary reward upon optimal choice behavior under risk.David E. Meyer - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):520.
On the predictions of cumulative prospect theory for third and fourth order risk preferences.Ivan Paya, David A. Peel & Konstantinos Georgalos - 2023 - Theory and Decision 95 (2):337-359.
Anton's Game: Deontological Decision Theory for an Iterated Decision Problem.Seth Lazar - 2017 - Utilitas 29 (1):88-109.
Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences. [REVIEW]Mohammed Abdellaoui, Olivier L’Haridon & Corina Paraschiv - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (2):175-191.
Influence of luminance on a two-choice decision task.James R. Nazzaro & João C. Todorov - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (5):696.
Dynamic Choice, Independence and Emotions.Astrid Hopfensitz & Frans Van Winden - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (2):249-300.
Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity.Enrica Carbone, Konstantinos Georgalos & Gerardo Infante - 2019 - Theory and Decision 87 (1):87-122.
Dynamic Choice, Independence and Emotions.Astrid Hopfensitz & Frans Winden - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (2-3):249-300.
A new apparatus for measuring choice and decision.M. F. Hausmann - 1932 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 (2):218.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-12-22
Downloads
70 (#299,480)
6 months
20 (#145,085)
2010-12-22
Downloads
70 (#299,480)
6 months
20 (#145,085)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
New paradoxes of risky decision making.Michael H. Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):463-501.
Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction.Andrew M. Colman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):139-153.
Bridging psychology and game theory yields interdependence theory.Paul A. M. Van Lange & Marcello Gallucci - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):177-178.
Adaptation of utility functions to reward distribution in rhesus monkeys.Philipe M. Bujold, Simone Ferrari-Toniolo & Wolfram Schultz - 2021 - Cognition 214 (C):104764.
References found in this work
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1974 - Science 185 (4157):1124-1131.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 2013 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson (ed.), The logic of grammar. Encino, Calif.: Dickenson Pub. Co.. pp. 64-75.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-kkgnk uwo