An investigation into the transition from technological to ecological rice farming among resource poor farmers from the Philippine island of Bohol

Agriculture and Human Values 20 (2):165-176 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A conceptual framework influenced bythe concept of moral ecology is developed andused to analyze the transition fromtechnological (green revolution) to ecological(organic) rice farming by resource poor farmersfrom the Philippine island of Bohol. This MoralEcology Framework (MEF) focuses on theepistemology of the two farming systems and howthis influences management principles andpractice. The orienting concepts of systemic understanding, exchange betweensociety and the environment, local versusextra-local exchange and scope areintegral to this analysis. The case studydemonstrates how the ostracism of nature underthe green revolution coupled with itsinflexible production options affected thesustainability of some local rice farmingsystems. Whereas the transition to organicfarming and the concomitant incorporation ofecological processes and more flexibleproduction options has allowed local farmers toenhance the sustainability of their farmingsystems by altering the exchange processeswithin the socio-ecological system

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Ethos of Rice and Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic and Aesthetics.Jeanette L. Yasol-Naval - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 11:191-196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
38 (#595,594)

6 months
12 (#302,973)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reductionist science as epistemological violence.Vandana Shiva - 1988 - In Ashis Nandy (ed.), Science, hegemony and violence: a requiem for modernity. Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 232--256.

Add more references