The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person

Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Edited by Josh Dever (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cappelen and Dever present a forceful challenge to the standard view that perspective, and in particular the perspective of the first person, is a philosophically deep aspect of the world. Their goal is not to show that we need to explain indexical and other perspectival phenomena in different ways, but to show that the entire topic is an illusion

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Essential Indexicality of Intentional Action.Matthew Babb - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (264):439-457.
Three routes to person indexicality.Alexander Podobryaev - 2017 - Natural Language Semantics 25 (4):329-354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
221 (#116,723)

6 months
13 (#265,352)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Herman Cappelen
University of Hong Kong
Josh Dever
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Eight Arguments for First‐Person Realism.David Builes - 2024 - Philosophy Compass 19 (1):e12959.
Minimal Fregeanism.Aidan Gray - 2022 - Mind 131 (522):429-458.
First personal modes of presentation and the structure of empathy.L. A. Paul - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (3):189-207.

View all 57 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references