Le relazioni pericolose. fraintendimenti, beffe e falsi tra scienze e humanities

Abstract

This paper is a contribution to the debate about value of research attempts aimed at reinstating a fertile dialogue between science and humanities. Indeed, the complex relationships between the “two cultures” in the past century can be analysed through three relevant examples of the main “pathologies” which affected interdisciplinary studies: Bergson’s interpretation of the Theory of Relativity, Thom’s implementation of Catastrophe Theory on Linguistics, and Sokal’s hoax against a cultural studies journal. Rethink critical issues and underline analogies and differences should help avoiding errors and misunderstandings which may exacerbate the mutual incommunicability. My aim is to highlight the causes of the conflict and to endorse the desirability of interdisciplinary studies if guided by intellectual honesty.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Cultural studies and critical theory.Patrick Fuery - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Nick Mansfield & Patrick Fuery.
An introduction to complexism.Philip Galanter - 2016 - Technoetic Arts 14 (1-2):9-31.
Friendship, love and the borderology of interdisciplinarity.Claus Emmeche - 2016 - In Claus Emmeche, David Budtz Pedersen & Frederik Stjernfelt (eds.), Mapping Frontier Research in the Humanities. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 77-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
5 (#1,757,746)

6 months
4 (#1,279,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references