Empowerment or Engagement? Digital Health Technologies for Mental Healthcare

In Christopher Burr & Silvia Milano, The 2019 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab. Springer Nature. pp. 67-88 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that while digital health technologies (e.g. artificial intelligence, smartphones, and virtual reality) present significant opportunities for improving the delivery of healthcare, key concepts that are used to evaluate and understand their impact can obscure significant ethical issues related to patient engagement and experience. Specifically, we focus on the concept of empowerment and ask whether it is adequate for addressing some significant ethical concerns that relate to digital health technologies for mental healthcare. We frame these concerns using five key ethical principles for AI ethics (i.e. autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and explicability), which have their roots in the bioethical literature, in order to critically evaluate the role that digital health technologies will have in the future of digital healthcare.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-24

Downloads
2,343 (#5,354)

6 months
239 (#12,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christopher Burr
The Alan Turing Institute
Jessica Morley
Oxford University

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
The idea of justice.Amartya Sen - 2009 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Explaining Explanations in AI.Brent Mittelstadt - forthcoming - FAT* 2019 Proceedings 1.
Information: a very short introduction.Luciano Floridi - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references