Why the NHS should abandon the search for the universal outcome measure

Health Care Analysis 3 (3):191-195 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers the use of outcome measures in the British National Health Service (NHS). Measuring outcomes is a major conceptual and practical problem. Many different measures are currently available yet no consensus has been reached on which should be preferred over others, or about which should take priority when they conflict. Some currently used measures are described, the relationship between these measures and the measured activities are discussed, and fundamental problems with both the measures and their use are revealed. It is shown that however assiduous the search, the ‘perfect’ outcome measure will always remain elusive

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,824

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quality of life is a process not an outcome.Leah McClimans & John P. Browne - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (4):279-292.
Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure.Leah M. McClimans & John Browne - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (1):47-60.
Measuring effectiveness.Jacob Stegenga - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 54:62-71.
Plausibilistic coherence.John R. Welch - 2014 - Synthese 191 (10):2239-2253.
A Pragmatic Defence of Health Status Measures.Ray Fitzpatrick - 1996 - Health Care Analysis 4 (4):265-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
19 (#1,186,386)

6 months
2 (#1,371,221)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The way around health economics' dead end.David Seedhouse - 1995 - Health Care Analysis 3 (3):205-220.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique.Michael Loughlin - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (2):135-139.
Behind the Wall paper.M. Loughlin - 1994 - Health Care Analysis: Hca: Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy 2 (1):47.
Health care values or business values?David Seedhouse - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (3):181-186.
Political challenge or political veneer?Virginia Bottomley - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (1):5-8.
Open letter.Steve Iliffe - 1994 - Health Care Analysis 2 (1):77-79.

Add more references