The Problem with Social Trinitarianism: A Reply to Wierenga

Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):295-303 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article, Edward Wierenga defends a version of Social Trinitarianism according to which the Persons of the Trinity form a unique society of really distinct divine beings, each of whom has its own exemplification of divinity. In this paper, I call attention to several philosophical and theological difficulties with Wierenga’s account, as well as to a problem that such difficulties pose for Social Trinitarianism generally. I then briefly suggest what I take to be a more promising approach to the Trinity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
746 (#33,373)

6 months
153 (#28,236)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey E. Brower
Purdue University

Citations of this work

The Logic of the Trinity.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2011 - Sophia 50 (3):363-374.
Objections to Social Trinitarianism.William Hasker - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):421 - 439.
Absolute Identity and the Trinity.Chris Tweedt - 2023 - Religious Studies 59 (1):34-54.
Trinity and creation: Why Kortum's argument fails.Tom Mccall - 2007 - Heythrop Journal 48 (2):260–266.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The identity of indiscernibles.Max Black - 1952 - Mind 61 (242):153-164.
Material Constitution and the Trinity.Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael C. Rea - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
Trinity and Polytheism.Edward Wierenga - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):281-294.

Add more references