- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Müller-Lyer illusion and the structure-strategy dichotomy
Gary M. Brosvic, Margaret Farrelly, Judith M. Risser, Jennifer Shander, Jody Clayton, Elizabeth Sypek, Loreen Kafer & Roberta E. Dihoff
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (1):11-12 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The separate components of the Muller-lyer-illusion.C. Porac - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (6):490-490.
Illusion decrement in wings-in and wings-out Müller-Lyer figures.Maria Watson, Suzanne Greist-Bousquet & H. R. Schiffman - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (2):139-142.
Interactions of subjective contours with the Ponzo, Müller-Lyer, and vertical-horizontal illusions.Glenn E. Meyer - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (1):39-40.
Nonequivalent roles for motor and visual feedback in the Müller-Lyer and horizontal-vertical illusions.Gary M. Brosvic, Margaret Farrelly, Edward Rebele, Donna Ribardo, Jill Gutowski, Loreen Kafer & Roberta E. Dihoff - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (1):42-44.
The role of contour and location mechanisms in the Mueller-Lyer illusion.Roger B. Howard & Michael Wagner - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (4):235-236.
The effect of optically induced blur on the magnitude of the Mueller-Lyer illusion.Lawrence M. Ward & Stanley Coren - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (5):483-484.
Common factors versus uncommon variability in comparisons of the Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions.H. R. Schiffman & Suzanne Greist-Bousquet - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (6):586-588.
Constancy scaling theory and the Mueller-Lyer illusion: More disconfirming evidence.Richard Griggs - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (3):168-170.
How the statistical structure of the environment affects perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion.Stephen Blessing & Martina Svetlik - 2007 - In McNamara D. S. & Trafton J. G. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 827--832.
Susceptibility to the Muller-lyer illusion, theory-neutral observation, and the diachronic penetrability of the visual input system.Robert N. McCauley & Joseph Henrich - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):79-101.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-22
Downloads
52 (#419,495)
6 months
8 (#591,777)
2014-01-22
Downloads
52 (#419,495)
6 months
8 (#591,777)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Nonequivalent roles for motor and visual feedback in the Müller-Lyer and horizontal-vertical illusions.Gary M. Brosvic, Margaret Farrelly, Edward Rebele, Donna Ribardo, Jill Gutowski, Loreen Kafer & Roberta E. Dihoff - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (1):42-44.
Influences of academic training and nonacademic experience on susceptibility to the horizontal-vertical illusion.Kimberly R. Edwards, Gary M. Brosvic & Roberta E. Dihoff - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (5):465-467.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-xlp8h uwo