Rules in relevant logic — II: Formula representation

Studia Logica 52 (4):565 - 585 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper surveys the various forms of Deduction Theorem for a broad range of relevant logics. The logics range from the basic system B of Routley-Meyer through to the system R of relevant implication, and the forms of Deduction Theorem are characterized by the various formula representations of rules that are either unrestricted or restricted in certain ways. The formula representations cover the iterated form,A 1 .A 2 . ... .A n B, the conjunctive form,A 1&A 2 & ...A n B, the combined conjunctive and iterated form, enthymematic version of these three forms, and the classical implicational form,A 1&A 2& ...A n B. The concept of general enthymeme is introduced and the Deduction Theorem is shown to apply for rules essentially derived using Modus Ponens and Adjunction only, with logics containing either (A B)&(B C) .A C orA B .B C .A C.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The proofs of α→α in P - W.Sachio Hirokawa - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):195-211.
On the Beth properties of some intuitionistic modal logics.C. Luppi - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (5):443-454.
A lambda proof of the p-w theorem.Sachio Hirokawa, Yuichi Komori & Misao Nagayama - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1841-1849.
Deducibility, Entailment and Analytic Containment.Richard Bradshaw Angell - 1989 - In J. Norman & R. Sylvan (eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic. Dordrecht and Boston: Springer. pp. 119-143.
Deduction theorems for weak implicational logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.
Basic Propositional Calculus I.Mohamed Ardeshir & Wim Ruitenberg - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (3):317-343.
A note on the ω-incompleteness formalization.Sergio Galvan - 1994 - Studia Logica 53 (3):389 - 396.
Paths to Triviality.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (3):237-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
70 (#299,269)

6 months
5 (#1,035,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic.Ross T. Brady - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):151 - 183.
From Hilbert proofs to consecutions and back.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Logic 18 (2):51-72.
Four basic logical issues.Ross Brady & Penelope Rush - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):488-508.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication.Alasdair Urquhart - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1059-1073.
Completeness of relevant quantification theories.Robert K. Meyer, J. Michael Dunn & Hugues Leblanc - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):97-121.
The gentzenization and decidability of RW.Ross T. Brady - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (1):35 - 73.
Multisets and relevant implication I.Robert K. Meyer & Michael A. McRobbie - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (2):107 – 139.

View all 12 references / Add more references