A First Glance at Non-Restrictiveness

Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):347-354 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Maddy's notion of restrictiveness has many problematic aspects, one of them being that it is almost impossible to show that a theory is not restrictive. In this note the author addresses a crucial question of Martin Goldstern (Vienna) and points to some directions of future research

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Second Glance at Non-restrictiveness.B. Lowe - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3):323-331.
Are Large Cardinal Axioms Restrictive?Neil Barton - 2023 - Philosophia Mathematica 31 (3):372-407.
Comparative Citizenship: A Restrictive Turn in Europe?Christian Joppke - 2008 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 2 (1):1-41.
What is a Restrictive Theory?Toby Meadows - 2024 - Review of Symbolic Logic 17 (1):67-105.
Maximality Principles in Set Theory.Luca Incurvati - 2017 - Philosophia Mathematica 25 (2):159-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#254,793)

6 months
18 (#145,294)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benedikt Löwe
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Are Large Cardinal Axioms Restrictive?Neil Barton - 2023 - Philosophia Mathematica 31 (3):372-407.
A Second Glance at Non-restrictiveness.B. Lowe - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3):323-331.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Believing the axioms. I.Penelope Maddy - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):481-511.
Descriptive Set Theory.Yiannis Nicholas Moschovakis - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (4):429-430.

Add more references