Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs

Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth and consensus-conduciveness of controversial debates. The book brings together research in formal epistemology and argumentation theory.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

9789400745995   9400745982   9400745990   9401784264   9789400745988

Other Versions

No versions found

View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mainstream and Formal Epistemology.Vincent F. Hendricks - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Argumentation, epistemology and the sociology of language.Steven Yearly - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (3):351-367.
Knowledge and the epistemic function of argumentation – Comment on Gascón's "Where are dissent and reasons in epistemic justification?".Christoph Lumer - 2020 - In Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Henrike Jansen, Jan Albert Van Laar & Bart Verheij (eds.), Reason to Dissent. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation. College Publications. pp. 219-224.
Degrees of Justification, Bayes’ Rule, and Rationality.Gregor Betz - 2012 - In Frank Zenker (ed.), Bayesian Argumentation – The Practical Side of Probability. Springer.
Knowledge in a Social Network.Staffan Angere - unknown
Aristotle's Formal Identity of Intellect and Object: A Solution to the Problem of Modal Epistemology.Robert C. Koons - 2019 - Ancient Philosophy Today 1 (1):84-107.
Bayesian Epistemology.Erik J. Olsson - 2012 - In Sven Ove Hansson & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), Introduction to Formal Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 431-442.
Arguments as Belief Structures: Towards a Toulmin Layout of Doxastic Dynamics?Fabio Paglieri & Cristiano Castelfranchi - unknown
Agency and Interaction What We Are and What We Do in Formal Epistemology.Jeffrey Helzner & Vincent Hendricks - 2010 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 27 (2).
Readings in Formal Epistemology: Sourcebook.Horacio Arló-Costa, Vincent F. Hendricks & Johan van Benthem (eds.) - 2016 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-13

Downloads
67 (#311,010)

6 months
5 (#1,015,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregor Betz
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

The Limitations of the Open Mind.Jeremy Fantl - 2018 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Robustness and Idealizations in Agent-Based Models of Scientific Interaction.Daniel Frey & Dunja Šešelja - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1411-1437.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Knowledge and belief.Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Science, truth, and democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references