The “Thinking-After” of Metanoia

Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):217-228 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Breton barely mentions the term “metanoia,” it well describes the radical change that takes place for anyone who adopts the logic of the cross. In effect, that logic results in a self that is radically de-centered. Moreover, to embrace that logic is to give up the demand for both reasons and signs. Arguing for a radicalconception of kenosis, Breton insists that it is a true emptying that remains powerless and senseless in light of any worldly logos and, as such, can only appear to be folly. Thus, the fool for Christ is truly a fool.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logos, Mythos, Stauros.Paul Ricoeur - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):229-238.
Stanislas Breton on Christian Uniqueness.Catherine Cornille - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):283-297.
Major Works of Stanislas Breton.Jeffrey Bloechl - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):329-330.
Revelation, Scripture and the Word of God.Jacquelyn Porter - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):299-314.
The Philosopher on the Road to Damascus.Jeffrey Bloechl - 2004 - Philosophy and Theology 16 (2):269-281.
Who is Anselm’s fool?Thomas O’Loughlin - 1989 - New Scholasticism 63 (3):313-325.
Models and Metanoia.Robert Mellert - 1973 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 47:142-152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
49 (#450,909)

6 months
5 (#1,059,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references