„Cutler on Laws of Tendency“

Radical Philosophy 27:33-35 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cutler et.al. declare themselves opposed to the epistemological privileging of any level of discourse, but prefer, instead, to engage in discursive analyses of specific problems. Nevertheless, their critique of specific laws of tendency in Marx's texts - concentratlon and centralisation of capital, the falling rate of profit, etc. - relies almost exclusively on a single epistemological argument: there can be no such 'thing' as a law of tendency.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Profit, Elasticity and Nature.Kohei Saito - 2018 - In Judith Dellheim & Frieder Otto Wolf (eds.), The Unfinished System of Karl Marx: Critically Reading Capital as a Challenge for Our Times. Springer Verlag. pp. 187-217.
The Category of "Social Law".Sh A. Kobakhidze - 1983 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 22 (3):78-81.
Capitalism's Collapse: Henryk Grossmann's Marxism.Rick Kuhn - 1995 - Science and Society 59 (2):174 - 192.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-13

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references