- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Beyond Consent in Research
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (3):361-368 (2014)
Abstract
Abstract:Vulnerability is an important criterion to assess the ethical justification of the inclusion of participants in research trials. Currently, vulnerability is often understood as an attribute inherent to a participant by nature of a diagnosed condition. Accordingly, a common ethical concern relates to the participant’s decisionmaking capacity and ability to provide free and informed consent. We propose an expanded view of vulnerability that moves beyond a focus on consent and the intrinsic attributes of participants. We offer specific suggestions for how relational aspects and the dynamic features of vulnerability could be more fully captured in current discussions and research practices.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Beyond Consent in Research.Emily Bell, Eric Racine, Paula Chiasson, Maya Dufourcq-Brana, Laura B. Dunn, Joseph J. Fins, Paul J. Ford, Walter Glannon, Nir Lipsman, Mary Ellen Macdonald, Debra J. H. Mathews & Mary Pat Mcandrews - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (3):361-368.
Capacity, Vulnerability, and Informed Consent for Research.Michelle Biros - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (1):72-78.
Ethical Issues in Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Focus on Risk and Consent.Laura B. Dunn, Paul E. Holtzheimer, Jinger G. Hoop, Helen S. Mayberg, Laura Weiss Roberts & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (1):29-36.
Informed consent in a tuberculosis genetic study in Cameroon: information overload, situational vulnerability and diagnostic misconception.Ali Ibrahim Mohammed-Ali, Eyoab Iyasu Gebremeskel, Emmanuel Yenshu, Theobald Nji, Apungwa Cornelius Ntabe, Samuel Wanji, Godfrey B. Tangwa & Nchangwi Syntia Munung - 2022 - Research Ethics 18 (4):265-280.
Ethical challenges of informed consent, decision-making capacity, and vulnerability in clinical dementia research.Pablo Hernández-Marrero, Sandra Martins Pereira, Joana Araújo & Ana Sofia Carvalho - 2019 - In Zvonimir Koporc (ed.), Ethics and integrity in health and life sciences research. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.
Informed consent, vulnerability and the risks of group-specific attribution.Berta M. Schrems - 2014 - Nursing Ethics 21 (7):829-843.
Interrogating the concept of vulnerability in social research ethics.Anna Traianou & Martyn Hammersley - 2024 - Diametros 21 (80):7-22.
Photovoice and refugee research: The case for a ‘layers’ versus ‘labels’ approach to vulnerability.Louise Humpage, Farida Fozdar, Jay Marlowe & Lisa Hartley - 2019 - Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-16.
Investigating assumptions of vulnerability: A case study of the exclusion of psychiatric inpatients as participants in genetic research in low‐ and middle‐income contexts.Andrea C. Palk, Mary Bitta, Eunice Kamaara, Dan J. Stein & Ilina Singh - 2020 - Developing World Bioethics 20 (3):157-166.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-17
Downloads
32 (#696,586)
6 months
8 (#551,658)
2017-02-17
Downloads
32 (#696,586)
6 months
8 (#551,658)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Exit from Brain Device Research: A Modified Grounded Theory Study of Researcher Obligations and Participant Experiences.Lauren R. Sankary, Megan Zelinsky, Andre Machado, Taylor Rush, Alexandra White & Paul J. Ford - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 13 (4):215-226.
Patients’ Beliefs About Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Ryan E. Lawrence, Catharine R. Kaufmann, Ravi B. DeSilva & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (4):210-218.
Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.Eric Racine, M. Ariel Cascio, Marjorie Montreuil & Aline Bogossian - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (4):253-278.
Stakeholders’ Ethical Concerns Regarding Psychiatric Electroceutical Interventions: Results from a US Nationwide Survey.R. Bluhm, E. D. Sipahi, E. D. Achtyes, A. M. McCright & L. Y. Cabrera - 2024 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 15 (1):11-21.
Informed Consent in Implantable BCI Research: Identifying Risks and Exploring Meaning.Eran Klein - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1299-1317.
References found in this work
Consent to Deep Brain Stimulation for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.Walter Glannon - 2010 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (2):104-111.
Vulnerable populations in research: The case of the seriously ill.Philip J. Nickel - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):245-264.
Hope and Patients’ Expectations in Deep Brain Stimulation: Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives and Approaches.Emily Bell, Bruce Maxwell, Mary Pat McAndrews, Abbas Sadikot & Eric Racine - 2010 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (2):112-124.
Vulnerable Brains: Research Ethics and Neurosurgical Patients.Paul J. Ford - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):73-82.
Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design: Table 1.Nir Lipsman, Peter Giacobbe, Mark Bernstein & Andres M. Lozano - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):107-111.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-4qrhw uwo