A Note on Freedom from Detachment in the Logic of Paradox

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (1):15-20 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We shed light on an old problem by showing that the logic LP cannot define a binary connective $\odot$ obeying detachment in the sense that every valuation satisfying $\varphi$ and $(\varphi\odot\psi)$ also satisfies $\psi$ , except trivially. We derive this as a corollary of a more general result concerning variable sharing

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,589

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A simple sequent system for minimally inconsisteny LP.Rea Golan - 2023 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):1296-1311.
Minimally Nonstandard K3 and FDE.Rea Golan & Ulf Hlobil - 2022 - Australasian Journal of Logic 19 (5):182-213.
A Dialectic Contra-Classical Logic.Nissim Francez - 2023 - Logica Universalis 17 (2):221-229.
BCK and BCI logics, condensed detachment and the $2$-property. [REVIEW]J. Roger Hindley - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (2):231-250.
Depth Relevance and Hyperformalism.Shay Allen Logan - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (4):721-737.
The Weak Variable Sharing Property.Tore Fjetland Øgaard - 2023 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 52 (1):85-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-15

Downloads
89 (#240,674)

6 months
12 (#263,823)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jeremy Seligman
University of Auckland
Thomas Forster
Cambridge University
Jc Beall
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.
Logic for equivocators.David K. Lewis - 1982 - Noûs 16 (3):431-441.
A Calculus for Antinomies.F. G. Asenjo - 1966 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16 (1):103-105.
Multiple-conclusion lp and default classicality.Jc Beall - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):326-336.
A useful four-valued logic.N. D. Belnap - 1977 - In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.

View all 8 references / Add more references