Animals and soil sustainability

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):89-98 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Domestic livestock animals and soils must be considered together as part of an agroecosystem which includes plants. Soil sustainability may be simply defined as the maintenance of soil productivity for future generations. There are both positive and negative aspects concerning the role of animals in soil sustainability. In a positive sense, agroecosystems which include ruminant animals often also include hay forage-or pasture-based crops in the humid regions. Such crops stabilize the soil by decreasing erosion, improving soil structure and usually require fewer chemical inputs. Monogastric animal culture is based on an agroecosystem consisting of mainly grain crops. These crops can result in the soil being exposed to water and wind erosion although soil conservation practices that significantly reduce soil losses may be followed. The management of animal manures is not always compatible with soil conservation practices. Careful management of the nutrients in manure is absolutely necessary to avoid nitrate contamination of ground water or phosphorus loading of streams and lakes. In a negative sense, increases in animal livestock populations in association with human population growth are promoting desertification in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. The key component for a fully compatible and acceptable association between domestic animals and soil productivity is proper management. Careful management of the components of an animal-based agroecosystem is required if soil productivity and environmental quality are to be maintained. Although we have much to learn, technologies are available to move a considerable way towards this ideal state

Other Versions

reprint Beauchamp, E. G. (1990) "Animals and soil sustainability". Journal of Agricultural Ethics 3(1):89-98

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hazard and Effects of Pollution by Lead on Vegetable Crops.M. N. Feleafel & Z. M. Mirdad - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (3):547-567.
Peculiarities of biotic interactions in the soil system.Bella Striganova - 2014 - Studia Ecologiae Et Bioethicae 12 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#552,839)

6 months
1 (#1,602,207)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A forage-based vision of ontario agriculture.E. Ann Clark & B. R. Christie - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (2):109-121.
A forage-based vision of Ontario agriculture.E. Ann Clark & B. R. Christie - 1988 - Journal of Agricultural Ethics 1 (2):109-121.

Add more references