Choosing scientific goals: The need for a normative approach

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (1):81-96 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/s0039-3681(97)00011-3

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Are there scientific goals?Gary Hardcastle - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (3):297-311.
A Priori in the Philosophy of Science.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (3):60-74.
A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem.B. D. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):249-267.
Scientific pluralism and metaphysics.David J. Stump - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64:64-66.
A Pragmatic Approach To The Demarcation Problem.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):249-267.
Comments on David Bloor.Steven Lukes - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):313.
Just truth? Carefully applying history, philosophy and sociology of science to the forensic use of CCTV images.Gary Edmond - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):80-91.
Normative all the way down.Stephen Turner - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (2):419-429.
Editorial Response to David Bloor.Gerd Buchdahl - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):299.
Review: Hatfield, The Natural and the Normative. [REVIEW]S. P. Fullinwider - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (3):485-491.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#548,225)

6 months
10 (#350,624)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Critical Science Studies as Argumentation Theory: Who’s Afraid of SSK?William Rehg - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):33-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aim-less epistemology?Larry Laudan - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):315-322.
If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It.Larry Laudan - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):369-375.
Laudan's normative naturalism.Harvey Siegel - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):295-313.
Review: The Value of a Fixed Methodology. [REVIEW]John Worrall - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):263 - 275.

Add more references