- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-38 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Commentary: Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification.Zhonglu Zhang, Christopher M. Warren, Yi Lei, Qiang Xing & Hong Li - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:363944.
But is it social? How to tell when groups are more than the sum of their members.Allison A. Brennan & James T. Enns - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
Social, not individual, identification is the key to understanding group phenomena.Rupert Brown - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:e143.
Ecology and functional specialization: The whole is less than the sum of the parts.John M. Findlay - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):551-551.
Group behavior in the military may provide a unique case.Rose McDermott - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
Roy F. Baumeister.Dianne M. Tice - 1993 - In Daniel M. Wegner & James W. Pennebaker (eds.), Handbook of Mental Control. Prentice-Hall. pp. 393.
The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory.John Bowlby - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (4):637-638.
Group members differ in relative prototypicality: Effects on the individual and the group.Michael A. Hogg - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:e153.
The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory.Mary Ainsworth - 1969 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (3):436-438.
Are the pathogens of out-groups really more dangerous?Mícheál de Barra & Val Curtis - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (2):85 - 86.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-09-03
Downloads
67 (#313,875)
6 months
9 (#475,977)
2015-09-03
Downloads
67 (#313,875)
6 months
9 (#475,977)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Same people, different group: Social structures are a central component of group concepts.Alexander Noyes, Frank C. Keil, Yarrow Dunham & Katherine Ritchie - 2023 - Cognition 240 (C):105567.
Commentary: Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification.Zhonglu Zhang, Christopher M. Warren, Yi Lei, Qiang Xing & Hong Li - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:363944.
Differentiation of individual selves facilitates group-level benefits of ultrasociality.Sarah E. Ainsworth, Roy F. Baumeister & Kathleen D. Vohs - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
The sense of moral obligation facilitates information agency and culture.Heather M. Maranges, Roy F. Baumeister & Kathleen D. Vohs - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
Human Nature Evolved to Enable Culture.Roy F. Baumeister - 2017 - Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture 1 (1):39-42.
References found in this work
The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind.Gustave Le Bon - 1899 - International Journal of Ethics 9 (4):521-523.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-zm6qt uwo