Gender and Gender Terms

Noûs 54 (3):704-730 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical theories of gender are typically understood as theories of what it is to be a woman, a man, a nonbinary person, and so on. In this paper, I argue that this is a mistake. There’s good reason to suppose that our best philosophical theory of gender might not directly match up to or give the extensions of ordinary gender categories like ‘woman’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-12

Downloads
7,102 (#842)

6 months
833 (#1,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Barnes
University of Virginia

Citations of this work

He/She/They/Ze.Robin Dembroff & Daniel Wodak - 2018 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5.
Are women adult human females?Alex Byrne - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (12):3783-3803.
Escaping the Natural Attitude About Gender.Robin Dembroff - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (3):983-1003.

View all 54 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On what grounds what.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In Ryan Wasserman, David Manley & David Chalmers (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
Construction area (no hard hat required).Karen Bennett - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (1):79-104.
On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In Ryan Wasserman, David Manley & David Chalmers (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references