- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why evolutionary epistemology is an endangered theory
Social Epistemology 2 (4):357 – 369 (1988)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Symposium on the role of the philosopher among the scientists: Nuisance or necessity? A reply to Baigrie.Joseph Agassi - 1989 - Social Epistemology 3 (4):319.
The social epistemologist in search of a position from which to argue.Steve Fuller - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (2):163-183.
What generativism is not: A reply to Brian Baigrie.Andrew Lugg - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (3):499-501.
Review of Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology. [REVIEW]Francis Remedios - 2012 - Philosophy in Review 32 (6):533-535.
Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems concerning the Use of Art in Science by Brian S. Baigrie. [REVIEW]Pamela Henson - 1998 - Isis 89:326-326.
Kuhn’s evolutionary social epistemology. [REVIEW]Michael Bycroft - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (3):425-429.
Why social epistemology is real epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-29.
Evolutionary epistemology as a scientific method: a new look upon the units and levels of evolution debate.Nathalie Gontier - 2010 - Theory in Biosciences 2 (129):167-182.
What is empiricism?--, Nativism, naturalism, and evolutionary theory.Cynthia Macdonald - 1990 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 64 (1):81-92.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-02-01
Downloads
85 (#246,172)
6 months
8 (#578,901)
2009-02-01
Downloads
85 (#246,172)
6 months
8 (#578,901)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Truth, selection and scientific inquiry.Stephen M. Downes - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):425-442.
The author responds: Popper and selection theory.Donald Campbell - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (4):371 – 377.
Natural selection vs trial and error elimination.Brian S. Baigrie - 1989 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3 (2):157 – 172.
References found in this work
The logic of scientific discovery.Karl Raimund Popper - 1934 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Hutchinson Publishing Group.
Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach.Karl Raimund Popper - 1972 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Conjectures and Refutations.Karl Popper - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.
Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes.Donald T. Campbell - 1960 - Psychological Review 67 (6):380-400.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo