Moral theorists

In Ruth F. Chadwick & Doris Schroeder, Applied ethics: critical concepts in philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 1--169 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Trust and Distrust of Moral Theorists.Annette Baier - 1993 - In Earl Raye Winkler & Jerrold R. Coombs, Applied ethics: a reader. Cambridge [Mass.]: Blackwell.
Review - Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason.Alexandra Couto - 2006 - Metapsychology Online Reviews 10 (5).
Review: Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. [REVIEW]D. W. Shoemaker - 2006 - Mind 115 (457):129-135.
Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason - Edited by Michael Byron.William J. Fitzpatrick - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (3):281-283.
Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason.Michael Byron (ed.) - 2004 - New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason, edited by Michael Byron. Cambridge university press, 2004, 245 pages. [REVIEW]Krister Bykvist - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (2):240-245.
A Critical Analysis of Some of the Limitations on the Scope of Moral Prohibitions Suggested by Two Quasi-Absolutist Moral Theorists.Susan Donna Levine - 1981 - Dissertation, Brown University
Many students of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics recognize the value of comparisons between Aristotle and modern moralists. We are familiar with some of the ways in which reflection on Hume, Kant, Mill, Sidgwick, and more recent moral theorists can throw light on Aristotle. The light may come either from recognition of similarities or from a sharper awareness of differences.“Themes ancient and modern” is a familiar part of the contemporary study of Aristotle that needs no further commendation. [REVIEW]Natural Law Aquinas & Aristotelian Eudaimonism - 2006 - In Richard Kraut, The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Satisficing: Not good enough.Henry S. Richardson - 2004 - In Michael Byron, Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 106--130.
A new defense of satisficing.Michael Weber - 2004 - In Michael Byron, Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 77--106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
11 (#1,501,265)

6 months
1 (#1,611,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Annette Claire Baier
Last affiliation: University of Otago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references