Modelling curiosity in decision-making

Theory and Decision 82 (1):75-91 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops a model of choice with an agent that is capable of experiencing curiosity using Loewenstein’s :75–98, 1994) information gap interpretation of curiosity. We then proceed to determine the restrictions on choice behaviour implied by the model in two choice environments: no discovery—where the Decision-Maker does not have the opportunity to learn—and discovery—where she is afforded such an opportunity. These restrictions can be applied by an observer to determine if a Decision-Maker’s choices align with the model.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stochastic choice over menus.Pedram Heydari - 2020 - Theory and Decision 88 (2):257-268.
A dynamical model of risky choice.Marieke M. J. W. van Rooij, Luis H. Favela, MaryLauren Malone & Michael J. Richardson - 2013 - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 35:1510-1515.
Decision Choice under Pareto Optimal Criteria.Sidharta Chatterjee - 2022 - Journal of Applied Economic Sciences (JAES) 17 (Fall 3(77)):210 – 219.
Rationality with preference discovery costs.Matthew S. Wilson - 2018 - Theory and Decision 85 (2):233-251.
Harmonic choice model.Pavlo R. Blavatskyy - 2023 - Theory and Decision 96 (1):49-69.
The role of existentialism in ethical business decision‐making.James Agarwal & David Cruise Malloy - 2000 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 9 (3):143–154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-04

Downloads
34 (#672,902)

6 months
8 (#613,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations