Russell, McTaggart, and “I”

Idealistic Studies 9 (1):66-76 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Of the half dozen crucial arguments around which McTaggart’s The Nature of Existence centers, one is borrowed from Russell. It seeks to show that we are directly acquainted with a spiritual particular which is the referent of the pronoun “I,” or, as McTaggart put it, “the self is known to itself by direct perception.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

McTaggart’s Theory of the Self. Knox - 1981 - Idealistic Studies 11 (2):151-166.
Russell and McTaggart.Margaret Macdonald - 1936 - Philosophy 11 (43):322 - 335.
Bradley and McTaggart on Time.David J. Farmer - 1996 - Bradley Studies 2 (2):104-116.
Two Russellian Arguments for Acquaintance.Matt Duncan - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (3):461-474.
McTaggart's Argument against the Reality of Time.M. Joshua Mozersky - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 64–67.
Time, Space, Dummett and McTaggart.Brian Garrett - 2017 - Metaphysica 18 (1):61-67.
G E Moore’s Time Realism.Emily Thomas - forthcoming - Gavin David Young Lectures in Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
31 (#731,185)

6 months
3 (#1,475,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references