Why the Wrongness of Killing Innocents is Not a Universal Moral Certainty

Philosophical Investigations 45 (1):58-76 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that the certainty about the wrongness of killing must not be considered as a universal, but as a local one. Initially, I show that there exist communities in which the wrongness of killing innocents is not a moral certainty and that this kind of case cannot be justified by arguing that such people are psychopaths. Lastly, I argue that universal certainties do not admit of exceptions: thus, the fact that some exceptional cases affect the certainty that killing innocents is wrong, leads me to conclude that it is a local certainty.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and basic moral certainty.Nigel Pleasants - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (4):669-679.
On the existence of moral certainties: The case of the pisa‐suaves.Enrico Galli - 2023 - Philosophical Investigations 46 (4):496-506.
Killing, wrongness, and equality.Carlos Soto - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (2):543-559.
The Wrongness of Killing.Rainer Ebert - 2016 - Dissertation, Rice University
Epicurus, Death, and the Wrongness of Killing.Mikel Burley - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):68-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-11

Downloads
51 (#421,935)

6 months
12 (#277,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?