Integrating Inferentialism about Physical Theories and Representations: A Case for Phase Diagrams

Critica 53 (158):47–77 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we argue for an integrated inferential conception about theories and representations and its role in accounting for the theoretical value of philosophically disregarded representational practices, such as the systematic use of phase space diagrams within the theoretical context of statistical mechanics. This proposal would rely on both inferentialism about scientific representations (Suárez 2004) and inferentialism about particular physical theories (Wallace 2017). We defend that both perspectives somehow converge into an integrated inferentialism by means of the thesis theories as being composed of representations, as defended from the representational semantic conception defended by Suárez and Pero (2019).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-21

Downloads
16 (#1,193,080)

6 months
4 (#1,249,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Javier Anta
LMU Munich

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Models in Science (2nd edition).Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2021 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1987 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 92 (2):279-279.
How models are used to represent reality.Ronald N. Giere - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):742-752.
Models and representation.Richard Hughes - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):336.

View all 20 references / Add more references