Compelled Speech at Work: Employer Mobilization as a Threat to Employee Speech Rights

Philosophy of Management:1-17 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Employers often encourage, incentivize, or even require their employees to engage in politics in a variety of ways. For example, employers often encourage employees to vote, press employees to support particular political candidates or policies, require employees to participate in political events, or ask employees to contact elected officials to advocate for the employer’s interests. Such practices are all forms of employer mobilization. This essay considers the threat that employer mobilization poses to employees’ speech rights, specifically employees’ right against compelled speech. I argue that employer mobilization practices are liable to infringe on employees’ right against compelled speech when three conditions are met: (1) the employer asks or encourages employees to express a particular political message that is inconsistent with some employees’ beliefs and values; (2) the employer forces some employees to express the employer’s message; and (3) the employees are not employed in a role or an organization in which expressing or supporting such messages is an essential part of the job.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Problems of legal regulation of control measures over employees.Igor Kravchenko - 2021 - Философия И Гуманитарные Науки В Информационном Обществе 11 (2):45-55.
Employer Loyalty: The Need for Reciprocity.Kemi Ogunyemi - 2014 - Philosophy of Management 13 (3):21-32.
The Ethics of Lateral Hiring.David Hart - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):341-369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-29

Downloads
4 (#1,807,317)

6 months
4 (#1,269,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron J. Ancell
Bentley University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech.Seana Valentine Shiffrin - 2011 - Constitutional Commentary 27 (2):283-307.
Business in politics : lobbying and corporate campaign contributions.Andrew Stark - 2010 - In George G. Brenkert & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), The Oxford handbook of business ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Corporate Political Speech and Moral Obligation.Mary Lyn Stoll - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 132 (3):553-563.

View all 9 references / Add more references