Affirmative action and redistributive ethics

Journal of Business Ethics 5 (1):73 - 77 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Management faces complex race related issues in which groups arguing entitlement appear to claim benefits historically enjoyed by others. Thus many affirmative action issues provoke animosity because they are framed as zero sum problems. To some extent they are zero sum. Therefore, rationales for corporate policy must address that forthrightly. Up to now the corporate justification has been weak. The article describes a social debt owed interracially resulting from the accumulation of current class benefits from past discrimination, and asserts that affirmative action policies have a firm ethical basis inasmuch as they are affectively redistributing benefits to pay the social debt

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethical Case for Affirmative Action.Prue Burns & Jan Schapper - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):369-379.
Affirmative action: An ethical evaluation. [REVIEW]Bill Shaw - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (10):763 - 770.
The Case Against Affirmative Action.Louis P. Pojman - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):97-115.
Affirmative Action and the Choice of Amends.George Hull - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (1):113-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
98 (#213,139)

6 months
7 (#671,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Time to Talk About Race.Robbin Derry, Paul T. Harper & Gregory B. Fairchild - 2024 - Journal of Business Ethics 193 (4):739-747.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references